The fight to protect premium cigars and small businesses has reached a critical juncture in Massachusetts. On November 25th, Senator Jason Lewis, alongside Representatives Tommy Vitolo and Kate Lipper-Garabedian, announced plans to introduce a bill in January 2025 that would implement a statewide “Nicotine Free Generation” (NFG) policy. This law, if passed, would prohibit the sale of tobacco products, including premium cigars, to individuals born after the date of the bill’s passage, effectively creating a generational ban.
This proposal, initially adopted in Brookline, and since implemented by EIGHT (ONE AS RECENTLY AS THIS WEEK) additional municipalities, represents a growing threat to the premium cigar industry. It is supported by a coalition of public health advocates, progressive activists, and local boards of health.
With Massachusetts’ reputation as a leader in tobacco control, the state’s Democratic super-majority in the state legislature could push this policy forward, setting a precedent not only for Massachusetts but for other states across the country.
Why This Proposal Matters
While the policy is framed as a public health measure, its inclusion of premium cigars is both unnecessary and harmful. Premium cigars are artisanal, handcrafted products enjoyed occasionally by adults, often for special occasions. Unlike mass-market tobacco products, they are not marketed to youth and have minimal public health impact. Including them in this sweeping generational ban ignores these distinctions and unfairly targets a segment of the industry that already operates under strict regulations.
Moreover, the “Nicotine Free Generation” proposal poses a significant threat to small businesses, many of which are family-owned cigar shops and lounges that contribute to local economies. These businesses rely on adult consumers and generate important tax revenue for their communities. Restricting premium cigar sales would jeopardize these businesses, lead to job losses, and push customers toward neighboring states with less restrictive policies, creating an uneven playing field for Massachusetts retailers.
The impact of this policy would not be limited to Massachusetts. If passed, it could serve as a model for other states to adopt, creating a domino effect of restrictive generational tobacco bans across the country. This would further threaten the premium cigar industry, setting a dangerous precedent that undermines adult consumer choice and the rights of small business owners nationwide.
Why We Must Oppose This Policy
The stakes of this proposal extend far beyond Massachusetts. Allowing the “Nicotine Free Generation” policy to move forward without opposition sends a message that overreach and one-size-fits-all regulations are acceptable, even when they harm small businesses and erode personal freedoms. For example, Aspen, Colorado, enacted the first city-level indoor smoking ordinance in 1987, banning smoking in restaurants. Just three years later, San Luis Obispo, California, banned smoking in all public buildings. By 2000, such bans had proliferated nationwide, illustrating how a single local ordinance can quickly lead to widespread adoption. Currently, California is implementing their Unflavored Tobacco List (UTL), which places onerous registration fees on premium cigars. Both Massachusetts NFG and California’s UTL represent the attack of anti-choice, anti-freedom legislation from both sides of this country – it is critical to fight back now to resist the momentum of this legislation as early as possible.
CRA believes that adults should have the right to enjoy premium cigars responsibly without undue interference. Current regulations, such as the Tobacco 21 law that is nationwide, already effectively prevent youth access to tobacco products. This proposed generational ban is redundant and sets a troubling precedent for government overreach into lawful, adult consumer behavior.
At its core, the proposed “Nicotine Free Generation” policy in Massachusetts is more than a local issue—it is a tipping point with the potential to reshape tobacco regulation nationwide. By targeting premium cigars, a product enjoyed responsibly by adults and distinct from mass-market tobacco, this policy risks setting a dangerous precedent that threatens small businesses, undermines personal freedoms and erodes consumer choice. It is essential for advocates, small business owners, and consumers to stand together and oppose this misguided proposal, ensuring that Massachusetts does not pave the way for unjust policies that could ripple across the country. Protecting premium cigars means protecting businesses, jobs, and the rights of adults to make their own choices.